John Rawls and Political Liberalism Essay -- Essays on Politics

prat Rawls and Political Liberalism Describe in detail the role that the ideas of imbrication consensus and comprehensive doctrine play in Rawls theoretical answer to the fundamental question of Political Liberalism How is it possible for there to exist over sequence a only when and stable society of free and equal citizens, who remain profoundly divided by reasonable religious, philosophical, and moral doctrines? (Rawls 4). More specifically, how do these concepts answer to preserve the traditional liberal determine of freedom and equality? And do these concepts help to preserve stability within a pluralistic society? John Rawls book, Political Liberalism, addresses the need for the reformation of the unjust democratic constitutional regime. According to Rawls, there is at present no agreement on the way the underlying institutions of constitutional democracy should be arranged if they are to satisfy the fair terms of cooperation between citizens rega rded as free and equal, (Rawls 4). In the real world, individuals all meet their own political values or comprehensive doctrines that are not in equilibrium with other values. These principles, not being compatible, cause problems in a weak democratic society. Thus, Rawls hopes to create a model for disagreements that could arise within liberalism, in which they could have stronger sense of common ground, or stronger overlapping consensus, which people seat make reference. Therefore, Rawls calls for the use of certain theoretical intellectual tools. The first order intellectual tool to guide this reform is the principles of legal expert. Strong principles of justices will lead to a large overlapping consensus and better political values, thus resulting ... ...because that which exists in the original position is fair. Moreover, there is a successful reform, in that a principle of justice (which is a tool of bringing about reform in an unjust democratic constitutional regi me) survived the test of the original position. Thus, the ideas of overlapping consensus and comprehensive doctrines do in fact play a significant role in his theoretical question How is it possible for there to exist over time a just and stable society of free and equal citizens, who remain profoundly divided by reasonable religious, philosophical, and moral doctrines? (Rawls 4). Moreover, these concepts help to preserve the traditional liberal values of freedom and equality help to preserve stability within a pluralistic society.Works CitedRawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York Columbia University Press, 1996.